Sunday, December 14, 2014

Dilute Xtol keeps fairly well


Two useful lessons this week. First, the film ran off the end of the spool so I couldn't rewind the file without opening the back of the camera. Next time make sure to use masking tape to secure the film; that was lesson #1. The second was a pleasant surprise. I hadn't done any developing since July but for some reason had a bottle full of dilute Xtol (1+1). Possibly foolishly, since it was so long that I had no idea what was on the film, I developed the roll of 35mm (taken with the awesome Nikon F5) with it. It hadn't discolored at all in probably 6 months (though the bottle was full right to the brim). And the results (e.g., above) were fine. So I now know that in a air-tight bottle with almost no air in ti at all, diluted Xtol keeps very well.

Sunday, June 1, 2014

Calibration

Most of the work I've been doing recently is about process standardization and reproducibility (quality in the operations management lexicon). Last year I systematized the time/temperature calculation creating a web-based app that uses data on the film, developer, dilution and temperature to calculate  the appropriate development time. Hit and miss is (thankfully) a thing of the past. More recently I've been focusing on calibrating the film, much as one calibrates a display or a printer.

Each emulsion responds to light in a unique way. Thankfully Kodak's process control is such that I haven't yet found differences between batches (although I'm not sure the films I've shot weren't actually from the same batch).

To begin I create a negative with bands of different exposure raging from seven stops under exposed to seven stops over. This is about the dynamic range of TMX-100. I develop the film and scan it with a linear tone curve, setting the black and white ends of the output to the darkest and lightest bands on the negative.

I then use GIMP to measure the level of grey the scan has generated for each level of illumination on the negative. From this I generate a series of tone curves (49 in all) for different ranges of emulsion density to compensate for the emulsion's characteristics at different exposures.

For example, one curve might correspond to a negative in which the shadows were 3 stops below middle gray and the highlights 5 stops above middle gray. Rather than labeling them in stops over and under, I label each curve for the range of measured emulsion densities. So in this example, the tone curve would be the one that captures emulsion densities from 143 to 232. (These are all out of 255, the 8 bit tonal representation in the digital image).Doing so allows me to choose the appropriate curve simply by looking at the histogram of the each negative.


TMX-100 measurements


The red line on the chart on the right shows the density of the TMX-100 emulsion for different EV levels. The response is clearly non-linear. At light levels above middle gray, (EV>0) there are only small differences in density; at low light levels the differences in density increase at each step until 5 stops under when they decline sharply.


This suggests first that underexposed areas, the shadows, will be hard to deal with unless the response curve is exactly matched to the exposure; and it reenforces the dictum - "expose for the shadows, develop for the highlights", which helps ensure one doesn't have to deal with the non-linear behavior of the emulsion for very low light levels (-5 EV and below).

The curved blue line shows the intensity of the scanned image for each exposure level. Because the negative was scanned with a gamma of 1.5 the line curves upwards rather than being straight.

Using Microsoft Excel, the tone curves are written into directly into the Windows registry keys for the Epson scanner; when the scanning software is opened the tone curve drop-down box is populated with the generated tone curves. Using them is fairly simple. Looking at the histogram for each negative, the levels for the darkest and lightest points are determined - since each tone curve covers a different range of emulsion densities this measurement determines which generated tone curve to use.

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Atlantis

A quick trip to Florida last week afforded the opportunity to spend a few fascinating and nostalgic hours at the Kennedy Space Center. The star attraction is the Atlantis orbiter, around which NASA has built a fascinating exhibition.

Atlantis (I)
To be within a few feet of the Space Shuttle, the searing heat of re-entry clearly visible in the charred insulating tiles on the nose, was for someone who grew up with the Apollo program, an indescribable experience. 

Atlantis (II)
For some reason I can't explain I was moved almost to tears; three days later I am still left completely awestruck by the monumental achievement of America's space program; and saddened that today we no longer have such lofty goals. 

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Printing (3D)

My 4x5 tank takes 54 fl oz, a bit much if I only want to develop one or two negatives. You can't partially fill the tank because the negatives stand upright. So I decided to try and design a negative holder that would fit in flat at the bottom of the tank.

This is the design. The  bracing struts are hollowed out to reduce the amount of material used (which quickly gets expensive).

The carriers are stack-able and the gaps in the sides are supposed to let the chemicals flow easily into the carrier and over the negative.

The design was created in Sketchup . Using the STL export plugin I created an STL file which I uploaded to Shapeways, a 3D-printing service. I chose the cheapest material (white flexible plastic).

This is the finished tray (actually two stacked together).
The good news is that the plastic isn't affected by developer or fixer. There are however some improvements I'm going to make. There probably isn't enough flow over the negatives - the negative that was in the lower carrier was spotty in places. And the slides are a little thin.

The cost per carrier was $11.55. A much more solid version will come in at $19.04 and I have a design somewhere between the two, with similar sides but stronger bracing ($14.06).

It's not a particularly cheap solution and it will take quite a while to pay for itself in saved developer, but it was an interesting exercise in creating something useful.